Beyond Buzzwords: Why Ethernet-APL alone won’t solve our industry challenges
One thing that you probably often read is that Ethernet-APL was developed to overcome the industry’s issues, specifically addressing the bad memories of the fieldbus introduction (and this article does as well!). Yet, this is not the full truth: Ethernet-APL standalone will only solve minor issues, like bandwidth bottlenecks. But it does not address the other major challenges we are facing.
It is important to understand, that only when a set of technologies come together, real and lasting value for end users is created. This set of technologies is called “technology stack”.
The good news is that the change of technology on the communication layer has been used by vendors and end users to also prepare these supplementary technologies and to package them
into a technology stack. This stack consists of:
- Ethernet-APL serves as the base layer, providing high-speed transmission of data for intrinsically safe applications.
- Protocols that build on top to transmit relevant data in realtime. These are PROFINET or EtherNet/IP for the moment, and potentially OPC UA FX in the future.
- Generic device profiles according to NE 131 that implement NAMUR standard devices, e.g., the PA Profile 4. This greatly simplifies device integration as well as allows to use a single device driver for transmitters of different vendors and versions during operation.
- FDI (Field Device Integration) coupled with PA-DIM for interoperable device integration into asset management systems for device parametrization and for structuring diagnostic information for NAMUR Open Architecture applications.
- For future applications, with still a way to go, a safety protocol such as PROFIsafe that allows the usage of the technology stack within safety applications.
Nonetheless, while this is known within an expert community, it is not common sense for normal end users. Therefore, one of the first initiatives of the APL Task Force was to update the NE 168 as the relevant requirements document, jointly with the responsible NAMUR working group 2.6. This document not only provides guidance for vendors and end users regarding the mentioned technology stack, but also addresses other technical questions.
Evolution instead of revolution: A community effort
One thing must be clear for every end user: with the huge base of installed brownfield systems, we cannot afford a revolution or disruption within our plants. Instead, the way we take with Ethernet-APL must rather represent an evolution of technologies and plants. This includes migration paths for the installed base, but also answers to other relevant questions, such as security of Ethernet-based field installations or usage within safety applications. Furthermore, as end users, we cannot single-handedly address all of these challenges: it is imperative that vendors comprehend the obstacles we encounter as a collective community.
All this reflects the key driver for the NAMUR APL Task Force’s activities: not purely focusing on the technical aspects of Ethernet-APL’s adoption by the industry, but instead following a holistic, community-driven, and collaborative strategy.
End users, you are not alone in this
A great example for this is the joint NAMUR Position Paper “Requirements for the Next Generation of Ethernet APL Field Devices and Components” (see QR-Code at the end) that was aligned within all Work Groups (WGs) of NAMUR Work Area 3 “Electrical and Instrumentation Technology” as well as the relevant WGs for Ethernet-APL itself (2.6), security (4.18.3), and safety (sub-WG APL-safety). This document reflects the first-ever consolidated end user voice regarding what end users currently lack when it comes to Ethernet-APL, including a dedicated section for backward compatibility for brownfield applications.
Another contribution of the Task Force is reflected in the beforementioned WGs: while security- and safety aspects becoming more and more important for end users, there were no dedicated
WGs within NAMUR that dealt with these essential topics on an Ethernet-APL-specific basis. Therefore, based on the Task Force initiative, these WGs have been established with the support of the responsible Work Areas. Within these, experts from various companies jointly, on the one hand, collaborate to develop concise security requirements and concepts for Ethernet-APL-based installations. On the other hand, NAMUR brings forward the application of Ethernet-APL within the safety domain – here in close collaboration with the vendor side represented by the relevant protocol organizations, such as the PI for PROFIsafe and ODVA for CIP Safety.